Subject: Nonqualified option-former employer
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003
From: Carol
Hi,
An individual was employed by a company from which he held
nonqualified stock options. After terminating employment, the
individual exercised some of the nonqualfied options and sold
them on the same day. The former employer sent the individual a
Form 1099-MISC for "non-employee compensation" for the difference
between the fair market value of the stock and the price paid for
the stock.
Is the individual subject to self-employment tax (i.e. both the employer and employee portions of the FICA/Medicare tax) for this compensation? Isn't the former employer responsible for the
employer portion of social security and medicare taxes as these
"wages" resulted from employment at the company?
The company will not revise to a W-2.
Thanks very much,
Carol
Answer
Date: 30 May 2003
Hello Carol,
This is a confusing area that I last answered in the March 11,
2002 issue of ESOAA Option Alert.
The IRS explanation for proposed regulations issued late in 2001
relating to withholding for ISOs and ESPPs point back to the
definition of wages under the regulations.
For income tax withholding, under Treasury regulations section
31.3401(a)-1(a)(5), "Remuneration for services, unless such
remuneration is specifically excepted by the statute, constitutes
wages even though at the time paid the relationship of employer
and employee no longer exists between the person in whose employ
the services were performed and the individual who performed
them."
A similar rule applies under Treasury Regulations Sections
31.3121(a)-1(i) and 31.3306(b)-1(i) for FICA withholding and FUTA
taxes.
There is an exception when an option is exercised after the year
of death of a deceased employee. (Revenue Ruling 86-109.)
I do not work extensively in the area of payroll tax reporting.
Employers should be seeking their own counsel in this area.
Good luck!
Mike Gray
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are hereby advised
that any written tax advice contained in this answer was
not written or intended to be used (and cannot be used) by any
taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be
imposed under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.