Table of Contents
New Tax Law May Decrease Tax Benefits of ISOs
President George Bush signed the new tax law Jobs and Growth Tax
Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 on May 28. According to the
newspapers, it's the third largest tax cut in history, yet it's
only seventeen pages long. The Republicans have vowed to pass a
tax cut every year during George Bush's presidency. Many tax
proposals were not included in this law, which leads me to
believe more tax legislation may be passed before the end of
2003.
Here are key provisions that relate to tax planning for employee
stock options.
- Decrease in the maximum income tax bracket for individuals from
38.6% to 35% retroactively to January 1, 2003. The decrease is
effective for 2003 and 2004.
- Decrease in the maximum tax rate for long-term capital gains
from 20% to 15%, effective for capital assets sold after May 5,
2003. The decrease expires for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2008.
- Increase the alternative minimum tax exemption to $58,000 (from
$49,000 ) for married taxpayers, filing jointly and $40,250 (from
$33,750) for unmarried taxpayers for 2003 and 2004.
- Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002,
most dividends from domestic corporations will be added to long-
term capital gains eligible for the 15% and 5% tax rates. In
order to qualify, the stock must have been held at least 60 days
during the 120-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-
dividend date. Dividends from certain foreign corporations
eligible for benefits from a comprehensive income tax treaty with
the United States will also qualify. Dividends taxed at long-
term capital gains rates will not qualify as investment income to
determine the limitation of the investment interest expense
deduction. Taxpayers may elect to have dividends taxed as
ordinary income to make more investment interest deductible.
Since the dividends still aren't considered to be capital gains,
capital losses in excess of the regular $3,000 limitation won't
be available to offset them. (More details apply to these rules
that are beyond the scope of this explanation.) Applying the
long-term capital gains rate to dividends is scheduled to expire
for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2008.
Significantly, the maximum tax rate that applies to compute the
Alternative Minimum Tax is unchanged at 28%. Taxpayers with
significant alternative minimum taxable income may not receive
any benefit from the increased AMT exemptions because they are
phased out.
More specifically relating to employee stock options, the
decrease in long term capital gains rates will make it harder to
recover the AMT credit because the AMT tax at exercise of an ISO
is unchanged at 28%. The long-term capital gains rate that
applies if the holding period requirements are met (more than two
years after grant date, more than one year after exercise) is
decreased to 15% from 20%. The recovery of AMT credit may be
limited to the tax rates that apply to the capital gain when the
stock is sold.
For the deferred gain at exercise, it may be appropriate to use
the Federal AMT rate in determining the tax benefit of not
selling the stock at exercise and meeting the holding period
requirements. Disregarding state income taxes, the benefit has
decreased from 38.6% - 28% = 10.6% to 35% - 28% = 7%. For
California taxpayers, the decrease is from about 9% to about 5%.
Is it really worth the emotional roller coaster you are going to
go through to meet the holding period requirements? In many
cases, no. You may be better off making a sale-exercise and
getting diversified earlier. You can then enjoy long term
capital gains rates for the investments you want to hold for a
longer term.
Another thing to think about is the change in taxation of
dividends as it relates to margin interest that qualifies for
deduction as investment interest expense. Investment interest
expense is only deductible against investment income, which
mostly consists of dividends, interest and short-term capital
gains. Interest rates are way down. Most people have capital
losses. Under the new tax law, dividends taxed at long term
capital gains rates are not included in investment income. That
could effectively eliminate the deduction for investment interest
expense. Since the price of including dividends in investment
income is to forfeit long term capital gain benefits, the tax
benefit of the investment interest expense deduction has been
dramatically reduced.
It's too bad dividends haven't been reclassified as long term
capital gains for all purposes. Many taxpayers could use the
capital gains income to use their capital loss carryovers, and
possibly recover some of their suspended AMT credit for AMT
capital loss carryovers due to AMT basis adjustments. Dividends
are taxed at long-term capital gains rates, but are not
reclassified as long term capital gains.
Obviously, some taxpayers will benefit more than others from this
tax cut legislation. Employees with incentive stock options will
generally not benefit as much as other taxpayers.
Questions and Answers
Question
An individual was employed by a company from which he held
nonqualified stock options. After terminating employment, the
individual exercised some of the nonqualfied options and sold
them on the same day. The former employer sent the individual a
Form 1099-MISC for "non-employee compensation" for the difference
between the fair market value of the stock and the price paid for
the stock.
Is the individual subject to self-employment tax for this
compensation? Isn't the former employer responsible for the
employer portion of social security and medicare taxes as these
"wages" resulted from employment at the company?
Answer
This is a confusing area that I last answered in the March 11,
2002 issue of ESOAA Option Alert.
The IRS explanation for proposed regulations issued late in 2001
relating to withholding for ISOs and ESPPs point back to the
definition of wages under the regulations.
For income tax withholding, under Treasury regulations section
31.3401(a)-1(a)(5), "Remuneration for services, unless such
remuneration is specifically excepted by the statute, constitutes
wages even though at the time paid the relationship of employer
and employee no longer exists between the person in whose employ
the services were performed and the individual who performed
them."
A similar rule applies under Treasury Regulations Sections
31.3121(a)-1(i) and 31.3306(b)-1(i) for FICA withholding and FUTA
taxes.
There is an exception when an option is exercised after the year
of death of a deceased employee. (Revenue Ruling 86-109.)
I do not work extensively in the area of payroll tax reporting.
Employers should be seeking their own counsel in this area.
Question
Say that your total compensation from a privately-held company is
$125,000, of which $100,000 is paid in cash and $25,000 is paid
in non-qualified stock options.
The options are granted at 50% of the established FMV of the
common stock. The FMV at exercise is $8 and the option price is
$4. An option is granted for 6,250 shares to arrive at $25,000.
If the company goes bankrupt and ceases to exist, can the
individual claim a $25,000 loss? Can it be a long-term capital
loss if the options have been held more than one year?
Answer
Since you (presumably) didn't report any taxable income for the
grant of the options, you have no tax basis in them. No loss is
allowed.
Question
I am currently employed by a privately held company. I am 100%
vested in my ESOP plan and have about $50,000 in my account. Is
there a way I can sell within or outside the company for cash?
Answer
You might be able to. I don't have enough details to answer your
question.
I suggest that you discuss this with the person responsible for
administering the plan at your company. ESOPs for privately-held
companies usually have a buy-sell agreement attached to them
where the company buys the employee's shares.
Michael Gray regrets he can no longer answer emails personally. He will answer selected questions in this newsletter.
The answers to most questions can be found in our course, "Secrets of Tax Planning For Employee Stock Options".
Return to Table of Contents
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:
As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are hereby advised
that any written tax advice contained in this communication was
not written or intended to be used (and cannot be used) by any
taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be
imposed under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
Return to Table of Contents
Consult with a tax advisor
For our readers who aren’t tax advisors, this newsletter is intended to alert you about tax issues that could affect you. It is not a substitute for advice from a professional tax advisor. You will find that getting advice from a qualified advisor is a worthwhile investment. We intend to eventually publish a directory of ESOAA members who are committed to helping clients with employee stock option issues.
Tax advisors should view the newsletter as an alert to become aware of issues relating to employee stock options for further research and study.
Return to Table of Contents
(Michael Gray is the co-author of Employee Stock Options – A Strategic Planning Guide for the 21st Century Optionaire. You can order the book at http://www.amazon.com or http://www.barnesandnoble.com/ or buy it at Stacey’s Books.)
P.S.
To receive the next issue of Michael Gray, CPA's Option Alert with more employee stock option tax developments and answers to questions from our readers automatically via email, subscribe by filling out the form below.