By Michael Gray
Table of Contents
IRS warns against aggressive refund claims
The deadline to file amended returns for many taxpayers who
suffered a tax hit from the 2000 market decline is April 15,
2004. The IRS has been receiving many claims for refund based on
very aggressive theories.
In an apparent attempt to discourage a flood of claims that will
create an administrative nightmare, the IRS has issued IRS Notice
2004-28 warning that penalties may be asserted against taxpayers
and tax return preparers for frivolous claims.
Five examples listed in the Notice of theories that the IRS
believes may be frivolous are:
- The options should have been taxed at their grant date, rather
than their exercise date.
- The fair market value of stock purchased under an option is
reduced by any restriction placed on the stock by the employer
that prohibits the employee from selling the stock for a
specified period of time.
- When, due to a margin call, a broker sells a taxpayer's stock
that was purchased under a nonstatutory option, the stock having
been pledged as security for a loan to pay the exercise price,
that sale is a forfeiture of the stock that causes an ordinary
loss rather than a capital loss.
- The purchase of the stock using borrowed funds was not in
substance a purchase because the employee did not have the
ability to repay the loan.
- Options should have been viewed as the economic equivalent of
the underlying stock and are thus not subject to any taxation of
the spread on exercise.
In addition to civil penalties, the IRS listed potential criminal
penalties that could apply for tax evasion (for the taxpayer) or
for assisting or advising about the preparation of a false income
tax return (for tax return preparers).
Although an IRS notice like this is not the "final word" on these
issues, the IRS has "raised the stakes" in contesting the tax
laws relating to employee stock options. Tax advisors and
taxpayers should be well prepared to show they have a reasonable
basis for the theories under which their tax returns are
prepared. The courts have been unsympathetic to "tax
protestors."
Return to Table of Contents
Extensions - and when you don't have the money to pay the tax
(This is a reprint from past newsletters.)
What do you do when you don't have the money to pay the tax?
My first recommendation is to file your income tax returns,
certified mail, by the initial filing date. One of the nastiest
penalties in the IRS's arsenal is for late filing - 5% per month
to a maximum of 25%. Some people who owe money don't file their
returns because they are afraid. THIS IS A HUGE MISTAKE! The
best approach is to be honest about your situation and work with
the tax authorities to resolve it.
When your file an extension, any balance of tax due when the tax
return is filed represents an exposure for the late filing
penalty.
Please don't misunderstand me. I regularly use extensions for my
clients and myself as a workload "safety valve". We often don't
have the information to complete a return by the due date. They
just aren't appropriate when there will be a significant balance
due that won't be paid by the original filing due date.
According to the Treasury regulations for the requirements to
file a valid automatic extension request, "an application for
extension must show the full amount properly estimated as tax for
the taxable year." (Reg. § 1.6081-4(a)(4).) The regulations
relating to reasonable cause for failure to file a tax return
state that if a taxpayer satisfies the requirement of showing the
full amount estimated as tax, the taxpayer has a reasonable cause
for failure to file during the extension period provided (1) the
excess of the amount of tax shown on the return over the amount
of tax paid by the original filing date (including the amount
paid with the extension form) is no greater than 10 percent of
the amount shown on the return (restated - 90% of the tax is paid
by the due date), and (2) any balance due shown on the return is
paid with the return. (Reg. § 301.6651-1(c)(3).)
(For California taxpayers, the extension is paperless so the
amount of the tax need not be stated. You are still required to
pay at least 90% of the tax by the original due date to avoid the
late filing penalty.)
If you have filed an income tax return for 2002, you can process
your federal extension electronically or by telephone - call 888-
796-1074 by April 15. Better call early to beat the rush!
Mailing a paper form is still acceptable and is the only way a
person who didn't file a 2002 income tax return can request an
automatic extension.
A taxpayer can still avoid the late filing penalty by
demonstrating a "reasonable cause," but this can be a hassle and
the taxpayer is at the mercy of the subjective judgment of a
representative of the tax authority.
Remember you may now pay income taxes using a credit card. Call
800-272-9829, or try the web site,
www.officialpayments.com. The extension for California is
1555. You can also call 888-729-1040. Maybe you can find a card
offering a low interest rate promotion that will work for your
situation.
Should you borrow using a margin account? In most cases, this is
not a good choice because of the exposure to margin calls if the
market declines.
Should you use an equity advance loan, secured by your principal
residence? In some cases it might be to your advantage, if you
can get a favorable interest rate. Remember interest for an
equity loan not used for a home improvement is only deductible on
a loan amount up to $100,000. This interest is not deductible
when computing the alternative minimum tax.
Remember that IRA accounts and even other retirement accounts can
be temporary sources of funds. Distributions from IRAs that
aren't minimum required distributions can be rolled over to
another IRA or returned to the same IRA within 60 days after a
withdrawal. This exception only applies to one rollover per
year. (You must wait more than one year after a rollover is
completed before making another one.)1
Certain distributions from other qualified plans can also be
rolled over within a 60-day period to an IRA or another qualified
plan.2 Using IRAs or qualified plans as a temporary source of
funds to pay taxes can be useful if the funds to complete the
rollover will soon be available, such as when there is a lockout
"window" that will soon be open. The cost of an error can be
high, because if the rollover isn't completed before 60 days have
expired, the distribution may be subject to tax as ordinary
income plus a 10% early distribution penalty.3
The IRS has a form for installment agreements, Form 9465. They
would prefer that you submit the form with your income tax
return. You can take up to five years to pay off your tax
liability. An advantage of arranging an installment agreement is
the penalty for late payment of tax is reduced from 1/2% per
month to 1/4% per month. In addition to penalties, interest is
charged for late tax payments. The interest rate is adjusted
quarterly. Recently, the rate has been five percent.
Another alternative is to make an Offer in Compromise, Form 656.
With this procedure, the IRS actually can reduce your tax based
on your ability to pay. You don't have to wait until you have
owed the tax a long time to use this procedure. I think it's
best to work with an attorney, CPA or enrolled agent when making
an Offer in Compromise. If the amount is large, an attorney is
probably the best choice.
Although it may provide relief from your other creditors,
bankruptcy doesn't offer much help for recent debts for income
taxes. When you make payments on your tax bill, be sure to
specify to apply the payments to taxes due. Penalties and
interest are dischargeable in bankruptcy, but income taxes
aren't.
It may be to your advantage to plan how to use regular tax or
alternative minimum tax capital loss carryovers or minimum tax
credit carryovers. You might need to generate capital gains,
which can be difficult when you're in financial distress.
Return to Table of Contents
First individual estimated tax payment is due April 15
(This is a reprint from past newsletters.)
Remember to review your estimated tax situation for 2004.
There is no estimated tax penalty provided the taxpayer pays at
least 90% of the tax (including AMT) on the current year's tax
return through withholding and/or equal quarterly estimated tax
payments.
For taxpayers who have no more than $150,000 of adjusted gross
income ($75,000 for married persons, filing separately) on the
previous year's income tax return, there is no penalty for
underpayment of estimated tax provided at least the income tax on
the previous year's income tax return (including AMT) is paid in
equal quarterly estimated tax payments plus withholding.4 For
taxpayers who have more than $150,000 of adjusted gross income
($75,000 for married persons, filing separately) on the previous
year's income tax return, there is no penalty for underpayment of
estimated tax provided at least, for 2003, 110% of the income tax
on the previous year's income tax return (including AMT) is paid
in equal quarterly estimated tax payments plus withholding.5
Taxpayers who have uneven income and deductions may also compute
their estimated tax on an "annualized" basis. You multiply the
year to date income and deductions to arrive at amounts for a
year, compute the tax for that amount, then pay amounts to
cumulatively pay in 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 and 100% of those amounts. You
should probably get help from a professional tax return preparer
to do this.
Return to Table of Contents
Stock option expensing requirement progresses
The Financial Accounting Standards Board has announced that
companies will be required to start reporting an expense when
employees are granted stock options, effective for companies with
fiscal years starting after December 15, 2004.
The announcement includes a different method of valuing the
options from past proposals, called the "lattice model". The
lattice model can result in a lower value than the Black-Scholes
method previously endorsed.
Meanwhile, representatives of the high technology industry are
lobbying in Washington, D.C. for limiting the expensing
requirement to options granted to key executives. The comment
period ends June 30, so write your comments to Congress and the
FASB soon.
Return to Table of Contents
Questions and Answers
Question
I exercised ISOs and paid the AMT a couple of years ago. I would
like to now donate those stock shares with the intention of:
- getting the write off for current market value for the stock
- getting back the prepaid AMT tax on them (since I donated them
and therefore had no real taxable gain.)
Is this doable? My tax advisor tells me that we can't get back
the AMT without selling the stock.
Answer
Your tax advisor is correct. It is the sale of the stock that
creates the difference between the tentative alternative minimum
tax and the regular tax that enables you to apply the AMT credit.
See Form 8801 and the related instructions.
The donation of appreciated ISO stock only makes sense when the
tax benefits of the donation dwarf the potential benefit lost for
the AMT credit. This will apply when the stock has increased
dramatically in value after the ISO was exercised, and the
taxpayer has met the holding period requirements for the stock.
Question
I read your article on "The Amazing Disappearing AMT Credit"
dated 7/28/99 and got even more confused than I was before with
ISO issues. Has anything changed for the better since that time?
I was granted an ISO during September, 2000 at $2.50. Now the
value is $35. I have not exercised my option yet and would like
to know what you recommend for me to do.
- If I exercise now, would I have to pay AMT right away or can I
wait until 4/15/05 and pay it then?
- Will I be penalized by the IRS if I don't pay the AMT in
quarterly installments?
- If I exercise before April 10, 2004 and sell on April 12,
2005, could I use the proceeds from the sale to pay the AMT for
2004?
- What is the best option to make everybody happy and not regret
afterwards that I didn't do the right thing?
- A lot of people in my company are frustrated with IRS issues
and overpaying too much. Could you suggest what to do to make it
simple?
Answer
Things haven't changed for the better since I wrote that article.
The AMT situation is worse. More and more people are becoming
subject to the AMT.
I can't give you a "correct" answer to your question. It
requires individual analysis based on your situation. As a
blanket statement, high income individuals who are residents of
high tax states like California are probably better off selling
the shares when they exercise their ISOs.
- As long as you pay the required estimated taxes or withholding
based on your 2004 income tax liability (for high income
taxpayers, 110% of last year's tax), there is no penalty for
paying the balance on April 15, 2005.
- See 1.
- You need to be able to have enough time to receive the
proceeds from the sale to pay the tax on April 15.
- Get a crystal ball. Mine is broken. What is your tolerance
for risk?
- Get out of "civilization" and live in a commune on a desert
island. Alternatively, get a good tax advisor to help you manage
the complexity.
Question
If ISOs are exercised, but not enough to incur an AMT, is the
cost basis of the stock for AMT reporting still adjusted to the
market price at exercise?
Answer
Yes.
Question
I exercised an ISO of 25,000 shares at 20˘ per share, or $5,000.
I swapped 2,222 shares at $2.25 per share. How do I present this
on my tax return?
Answer
You don't.
You will still report the AMT adjustment for the options that you
exercised, but there is no other information required to be
presented.
I recommend that you get a tax return preparer to help you handle
this correctly. Accounting for swaps is tricky.
Question
I worked for a Colorado-based, publicly-traded company until
October 2001. I relocated to California in January 2002. During
my tenure with the company, I received incentive stock options.
When I attempted to exercise the options in March 2002, the
company refused to allow the exercise. An attorney and many
dollars later, the company paid out the options in 2004, and
collected state taxes for Colorado. Is this correct? Shouldn't
taxes have been collected based on my resident state of
California and reflected this way on my W-2?
Answer
No. Since you received the options and they vested based on
services performed as an employee in Colorado, the income is
Colorado-source income, taxable in Colorado. You are also
required to report the income on your California income tax
return, but you claim a state tax credit for taxes paid with
respect to double-taxed income in Colorado.
Question
I am working with a client that exercised ISOs 2 1/2 years after
the grant date and performed a sale of those options on the same
day. The gain on the sale is being reported on his W-2 as wages
and considered a disqualifying transaction. Is that correct?
Answer
Yes. Look at Internal Revenue Code Section 422.
Michael Gray regrets he can no longer answer emails personally.
He will answer selected questions in this newsletter.
Return to Table of Contents
Have you subscribed to Michael Gray, CPA's Tax and Business
Insight?
This free email newsletter covers general tax and business
issues. To see past issues and to subscribe, visit our web site
at http://www.taxtrimmers.com.
Return to Table of Contents
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:
As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are hereby advised
that any written tax advice contained in this communication was
not written or intended to be used (and cannot be used) by any
taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be
imposed under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
Return to Table of Contents
Consult with a tax advisor
For our readers who aren’t tax advisors, this newsletter is intended to alert you about tax issues that could affect you. It is not a substitute for advice from a professional tax advisor. You will find that getting advice from a qualified advisor is a worthwhile investment.
Tax advisors should view the newsletter as an alert to become aware of issues relating to employee stock options for further research and study.
Return to Table of Contents
(Michael Gray is the co-author of Employee Stock Options – A Strategic Planning Guide for the 21st Century Optionaire. You can order the book at http://www.amazon.com or http://www.barnesandnoble.com/ or buy it at Stacey’s Books.)
P.S.
To receive the next issue of Michael Gray, CPA's Option Alert with more employee stock option tax developments and answers to questions from our readers automatically via email, subscribe by filling out the form below.
1 Internal Revenue Code § 408(c)(3)
2 Internal Revenue Code § 402(c)
3 Internal Revenue Code § 72(t)
4 Internal Revenue Code § 6654(d)(1)
5 Internal Revenue Code § 6654(d)(1)(C)