Table of Contents
Swap exercise of ISOs clarification
Thanks to Brad Pulliam, CPA of Mellott & Mellott, PLL in
Cincinnati, Ohio, I am revisiting a question in our last
newsletter about swapping shares to exercise an ISO. My answer
to the question was incomplete.
The question was: "My understanding of a stock swap exercise of
ISOs is that the exchange shares maintain their original cost
basis and acquisition date, while the newly acquired shares
receive a basis of $0.
I believe if I were to sell the new shares before one year after
exercising that it would create a disqualifying disposition and I
would have to pay ordinary income tax. What happens if I sell the
exchange shares? Would that create a disqualifying disposition
too?"
My original answer was: "No. Only the sale of the 'new' shares
will result in a disqualifying disposition. The old shares keep
their characteristics, including basis and acquisition date."
Here's more information about this issue.
According to the regulations, for the purposes of determining a
disqualifying disposition, the holding period for all of the
shares (including the exchanged shares) are considered as
starting on the date of exercise. More importantly, according to
regulations section 1.422-5(b)(2), "...the optionee's
disqualifying disposition of any of the stock acquired through
such exercise is treated as a disqualifying disposition of the
stock with the lowest basis." In other words, the regulations
specify an ordering rule for the disposition of shares. The
shares for which ordinary income would be recognized are
considered sold first.
Here's an example, loosely based on one in the regulations. On
June 1, 2004, X Corporation grants an incentive stock option to
employee A to purchase 100 shares of X Corporation common stock
at $10 per share. A may swap other shares of X Corporation stock
to exercise the option. A owns 40 shares of X Corporation common
stock, purchased on the open market on June 1, 2002 for $5 per
share. On June 1, 2005, when the fair market value of the shares
is $25 per share, A swaps his 40 shares to exercise the ISO.
The tax basis for 40 shares is $5, with an acquisition date of
June 1, 2002. The tax basis for 60 shares is zero, with an
acquisition date of June 1, 2005.
On September 1, 2005, A sells 75 of the shares for $30 per share.
A is considered first selling the 60 "new" shares and recognizing
the related ordinary income of $1,500. ($25 FMV at exercise - $0
tax basis = $25 ordinary income per share X 60 shares = $1,500.
Note this equals $25 FMV - $10 option price = $15 ordinary income
per share X 100 shares for ISO = $1,500.) The short-term capital
gain for the "new" shares is $30 - $25 = $5 per share X 60 shares
= $300. The long-term capital gain for the "old" shares is $30 -
$5 = $25 per share X 15 = $375.
For alternative minimum tax reporting, $1,500 ordinary income is
reported relating to the exercise of the ISO. ($25 FMV - $0 cost
= $25/share X 60 shares = $1,500.) It appears to me you should
follow the shares considered to be sold for regular tax purposes
in determining AMT reporting and adjustments. Therefore, the
short-term capital gain for the "new" shares is $30 sales price
- $25 FMV at exercise = $5 per share X 60 shares = $300. The
long-term capital gain for the "old" shares is $30 - $5 = $25 per
share X 15 = $375. Note that the regular tax and AMT amounts are
the same because the "new" shares were sold during the year of
exercise. There are no AMT adjustments.
Now that I've explained this, here's an editorial note. The swap
to exercise is a "gee whiz" technique that usually isn't so
great. Why? Because you still have to pay the alternative
minimum tax for exercising the option. Under the current tax
regime, with a 35% maximum federal regular tax rate and a 28%
maximum federal AMT rate, it just isn't worth taking much risk to
hold onto the shares to meet the holding period requirements when
you're dealing with big amounts, especially when your state has a
high income tax rate, like California. Throwing in the "ordering
rules" that require the "ordinary income" shares to be sold first
makes this technique even less attractive. Also, if you expect
the value of the shares to increase dramatically, you will
benefit more by not swapping shares because you will own more
shares without a swap.
Sorry for the incomplete answer I gave before. We are working
hard clearing up our backlog of extended income tax returns and
helping clients with tax planning. I have had fewer clients make
swap exercises than I can count on one hand.
Return to Table of Contents
Will accounting changes for employee stock options become
required for financial reporting? A political hot potato
With the accounting scandals at Enron and Worldcom, the Financial
Accounting Board had an opening and political pressure to require
reporting some cost for grants of employee stock options.
Thanks to unrelenting lobbying by the high technology industry,
Congress is considering legislation to require expensing only for
the chief executive officer and the next four highest-paid
employees of publicly-held companies. Small companies would be
exempt from reporting. The Stock Option Accounting Reform Act
has passed in the House Financial Services Committee. So far,
the Senate seems less supportive of this proposal.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board has indicated it is
considering postponing the effective date for its new statement
requiring expensing.
The high tech industry may at least buy some additional time for
executives and employees to cash in their options before the new
rules become effective, if they ever do.
Return to Table of Contents
IRS explains payroll tax issues for non-qualified options
transferred in a divorce
During 2002, the IRS issued Revenue Ruling 2002-22, concluding
that the transfer of non-qualified stock options to a former
spouse relating to a property settlement for a divorce is not
currently taxable. The IRS also published Notice 2002-31,
explaining payroll tax reporting when the option is exercised.
Now the IRS has issued more definitive payroll reporting rules in
Revenue Ruling 2004-60.
When the nonemployee spouse exercises the NQO, the exercise is
subject to income tax withholding. The rate of tax for
withholding is the rate for supplemental income, currently 25%.
The nonemployee spouse is not required to submit a Form W-4 to
the employer. The ordinary income and income tax withholding are
reported on Form 1099-MISC.
The exercise of the NQO is subject to employment taxes for the
employee. The employer is required to withhold the appropriate
FICA and Medicare tax based on the year-to-date facts for the
employee. The FICA and Medicare income and related withholding
are reported on the employee's Form W-2. The employer is also
subject to any related unemployment taxes for the income amount.
The IRS has explained its procedural requirements. As part of
their property settlement agreement, the former spouses should
define whether the employee spouse is required to reimburse to
nonemployee spouse for employment taxes paid to the employer, or
whether the employee spouse should pay those taxes directly to
the employer.
In order for the financial arrangements to work for the exercise
of a NQO by a nonemployee spouse, it appears the stock will have
to be sold. This may be a real problem when the stock isn't
publicly traded.
Return to Table of Contents
Questions and Answers
Question
A former employer gave me both incentive stock options and
nonqualified stock options and then filed chapter 11. The
company will probably soon file chapter 7. I didn't exercise the
options. Is there any way I can claim a tax deduction for the
worthless stock options?
Answer
No. Since you never reported any taxable income for receiving
the options and made no cash investment in them, you have no tax
basis or investment to deduct.
Question
I currently work for a pre-IPO company. I have received an
initial grant of ISO stock options. The current plan does not
include a clause allowing early exercise of unvested options.
Is it possible and/or legal for a company to add such a clause to
its stock option plan retroactively for previously-granted
options? Is there any precedent for this sort of addendum?
Answer
I believe a change like this is permissible. Your company's
counsel should refer to Internal Revenue Code Section
424(h)(3)(C).
Remember that accelerating the ability to exercise ISOs can
result in the $100,000 per year limit being exceeded, converting
some of the ISOs to NQOs.
Question
My husband has non-qualified stock options. Do you have to pay
taxes at the time you exercise the options, or can you elect not
to and pay the balance of the taxes when you file your income tax
returns?
Answer
If your husband is an employee, his employer is required to
withhold income taxes and employment taxes (like Social Security
and Medicare) when he exercises the options. Since the required
federal withholding is 25%, he may owe some additional taxes in
April and should also determine whether he should make estimated
tax payments.
If your husband is not an employee, withholding is not required
and he should review the estimated tax rules to determine whether
he needs to make estimated tax payments for the income to be
reported.
Question
I exercised some incentive stock options and the company withheld
no taxes from my cashless exercise. Am I required to pay
estimated taxes? Will I owe AMT?
Answer
I recommend that you meet with a tax advisor to compute your
individual tax amounts. Remember that no penalty will apply for
underpayment of estimated tax provided you pay through your
withholding at least the tax on last year's income tax return, or
110% of the tax on last year's income tax return if your adjusted
gross income for last year was more than $150,000. Federal
estimated tax payments are made using Form 1040ES. You can get
the forms at the IRS web site, http://www.irs.gov. California
estimated tax payments are made using Form 540ES. You can get
those forms at the FTB web site, http://www.ftb.ca.gov.
Michael Gray regrets he can no longer answer emails personally.
He will answer selected questions in this newsletter.
Return to Table of Contents
Have you subscribed to Michael Gray, CPA's Tax and Business
Insight?
This free email newsletter covers general tax and business
issues. To see past issues and to subscribe, visit our web site
at http://www.taxtrimmers.com.
Return to Table of Contents
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:
As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are hereby advised
that any written tax advice contained in this communication was
not written or intended to be used (and cannot be used) by any
taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be
imposed under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
Return to Table of Contents
Consult with a tax advisor
For our readers who aren’t tax advisors, this newsletter is intended to alert you about tax issues that could affect you. It is not a substitute for advice from a professional tax advisor. You will find that getting advice from a qualified advisor is a worthwhile investment.
Tax advisors should view the newsletter as an alert to become aware of issues relating to employee stock options for further research and study.
Return to Table of Contents
(Michael Gray is the co-author of Employee Stock Options – A Strategic Planning Guide for the 21st Century Optionaire. You can order the book at http://www.amazon.com or http://www.barnesandnoble.com/ or buy it at Stacey’s Books.)
P.S.
To receive the next issue of Michael Gray, CPA's Option Alert with more employee stock option tax developments and answers to questions from our readers automatically via email, subscribe by filling out the form below.