Table of Contents
We have moved!
Please make a note that we have moved. Our new address is 2190
Stokes St., Suite 102, San Jose, CA 95128, which is about a
three-minute walk from our old address. Our telephone numbers,
fax number and email addresses remain the same.
Moving has been an adventure. Our telephone system was out of
service from Friday, April 27 to Friday, May 4.
We didn't have internet access from April 27 to May 9. Donna
Jeffries says she has over 3,800 emails to wade through!
A big THANK YOU to my brother-in-law, Lane Johnston, who helped
me move our filing cabinets and over 100 boxes to our new office.
Things are finally getting settled, but we still have many boxes
to unpack. Whew!
Return to Table of Contents
Welcome baby Kara Siemer!
Kara Norrine Siemer was born on April 25. She was five pounds,
ten ounces. She is my first granddaughter and second grandchild.
Mother Dawn (Gray) and father John Siemer are thrilled and doing
well.
|
| Here is Kara
|
Return to Table of Contents
IRS issues final Section 409A (non-qualified deferred
compensation) regulations
On April 7, the IRS issued final regulations for Internal Revenue
Code Section 409A, which gives the rules that apply to non-
qualified deferred compensation plans.
Sometimes non-qualified stock options and other equity-based
compensation plans can be subject to Section 409A. Since
compensation will have to be reported each year for plans subject
to the rules and penalties apply to the compensation amounts, you
want to avoid it if at all possible.
The new regulations are effective April 17, 2007, but Notice
2005-1 and the proposed regulations can be relied on for taxable
years beginning before January 1, 2008.
Most of the provisions relating to equity-based compensation are
similar to those of the proposed regulations. "Statutory" stock
options - including incentive stock options and employee stock
purchase plans, aren't subject to Section 409A because the
options are required to be valued based on the fair market value
on the grant date (with the exception of the 15% discount for
ESPPs and the ability to use the lesser of the fair market value
of the stock on the grant date or the exercise date to price an
ESPP.)
Non-qualified stock options aren't subject to Section 409A if the
option price isn't less than the fair market value of the stock
on the grant date.
Companies can replace improperly priced options with properly
priced ones. For top officers, replacement options had to be
issued by December 31, 2006. For other employees, replacement
options can be issued up to December 31, 2007.
The valuation rules in the proposed regulations generally
continue to apply under the final regulations. For publicly-
traded stock, the fair market value may be determined based on
the last sale before or the first sale after the grant, the
closing price on the trading day before or the trading day of the
grant, the arithmetic mean of the high and low prices on the
trading day before or the trading day of the grant, or another
reasonable method based on actual transactions of the stock. An
average selling price within a specified period within 30 days
before or 30 days after the valuation date can be used. The same
method should be consistently used for all non-qualified options
granted by the company.
If the stock isn't publicly traded on an established securities
market, a the stock must be valued by a "reasonable method." The
method could be a formula or could be an independent appraisal
using a valuation date no more than 12 months before the grant of
the option.
If the company is a start up company that has been in business
less than 10 years and has no publicly-traded stock, the stock
valuation should be evidenced by a written report by a person the
company believes is qualified to issue such a report. (Back to
an appraisal.)
The valuation requirements for a start-up are supposed to be more
relaxed, unless the company expects a change of ownership within
90 days after grant or that a public offering will be made within
180 days after the grant.
Although alternative valuation methods can be used, determining
value based on an appraisal shifts the burden of proof the to
IRS.
The final regulations eliminate the requirement that the same
consistent valuation be used for determining the option price,
establishing the payment amount for a stock appreciation right,
or a buyback amount. Once an exercise price has been
established, the exercise price may not be changed retroactively
to the use of another valuation method.
The stock for which options may be issued has been liberalized in
the final regulations. The stock must be common stock, and must
not have any preferences as to distributions. Service recipient
stock includes stock of the corporation for which the service
provider was providing services at the date of grant, or any
corporation in a chain of organizations all of which have a
controlling interest in another organization, beginning with the
parent organization and ending with the organization for which
the service provider was providing services. (Parent stock can
be used, but not stock of a "sibling" or "child" entity.)
A controlling interest only requires a 50% interest (it was 80%
in the proposed regulations), and a 20% interest can qualify when
the stock right is based on a legitimate business criteria.
If the option is modified, the modification could be considered
to be a new grant of an option, which could make the option
subject to Section 409A. This particularly applies if the term
of the option at the old price is extended. However, extensions
of time to exercise options before April 10, 2007 are
grandfathered.
Although the acceleration of the date when an option is
exercisable isn't considered to be a "modification," for a stock
right otherwise subject to Section 409A, it might be an
impermissible acceleration of a payment date.
My printout of the preamble and the regulations are 232 pages.
There are many common transactions that the regulations can apply
to besides stock options. I can't cover all of the details here.
If you are a tax advisor, I recommend that you study them. If
you are a taxpayer, I recommend that you ask your tax advisor to
review how these new regulations apply to you.
(TD 9321, 72 FR 19233, April 17, 2007.)
Return to Table of Contents
Questions and Answers
Question
I recently received a job offer in California and am considering
relocating. I have some ISO shares received in Washington state
that are "locked up" and I hoped to sell the shares later this
year. I've held them for more than one year, and expect to pay
Federal capital gains tax and AMT. I'm concerned I will have an
additional California tax liability.
Any pointers?
Answer
Don't move to California until you sell the shares. A California
resident is subject to tax on his or her worldwide income, with a
potential state tax credit if another state taxes the income.
Washington state has no state income tax, so no state tax credit
will be available. Since you weren't a resident of California
when you exercised the options, there was no California AMT and
no California AMT credit.
California gives no tax break for long-term capital gains. They
are subject to the regular tax rates - generally up to 9.3%,
10.3% if you have over $1 million of California taxable income.
Question
I recently exercised some stock options and my employer withheld
about $40,000 in taxes. Is there a time requirement for them to
report and pay these taxes to the IRS and state?
Answer
Yes. The time frame is pretty short. See IRS publication 15,
Circular E at the IRS web site, www.irs.gov, page 19.
Michael Gray regrets he can no longer answer emails personally.
He will answer selected questions in this newsletter.
We do not provide free technical support for TurboTax!
Return to Table of Contents
Do you know about our other newsletters?
For general tax developments, tax planning ideas, business
development ideas and book reviews, subscribe to Michael Gray, CPA's Tax & Business Insight.
We are now offering our real estate tax newsletter,
Michael Gray, CPA's Real Estate Tax Letter, free of charge. Like this
newsletter, we will talk about new developments, have reports on
special tax concerns, and answer questions and answers. To subscribe and read a sample issue, visit
realestatetaxletter.com.
Return to Table of Contents
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:
As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are hereby advised
that any written tax advice contained in this communication was
not written or intended to be used (and cannot be used) by any
taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be
imposed under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
Return to Table of Contents
Consult with a tax advisor
For our readers who aren’t tax advisors, this newsletter is intended to alert you about tax issues that could affect you. It is not a substitute for advice from a professional tax advisor. You will find that getting advice from a qualified advisor is a worthwhile investment.
Tax advisors should view the newsletter as an alert to become aware of issues relating to employee stock options for further research and study.
Return to Table of Contents
(Michael Gray is the co-author of Employee Stock Options – A Strategic Planning Guide for the 21st Century Optionaire. You can order the book at www.amazon.com or www.barnesandnoble.com or buy it at Stacey’s Books.)
P.S.
To receive the next issue of Michael Gray, CPA's Option Alert with more employee stock option tax developments and answers to questions from our readers automatically via email, subscribe by filling out the form below.