Table of Contents
Happy Thanksgiving!
Hope you and your family have a happy and safe Thanksgiving!
We are thankful for our clients and the readers of this
newsletter.
Return to Table of Contents
Make your year-end planning appointment now!
The end of the year will soon be here, so make your year-end
planning appointments now! Call Dawn Siemer at 408-918-3162 on
weekday afternoons.
Return to Table of Contents
If you exercised ISOs during 2007,
should you use the "escape hatch"?
Remember if you exercised ISOs during 2007 and didn't sell the
stock, your AMT adjustment will be based on the fair market value
on the date of exercise. However, if you sell the stock before
the end of the year of exercise, the AMT adjustment is eliminated.
Ordinary income is reported for the excess of the selling price
over the option price. I call this strategy "the escape hatch".
For example Jean Employee exercised an ISO for 1,000 shares of XYZ
Software on March 1, 2007. The fair market value of the shares on
March 1, 2007 was $55 per share and the option price was $5 per
share. If Jean didn't sell the stock, she would report additional
AMT income of $55 - $5 = $50 X 1,000 shares =$50,000. On November
30, 2007, Jean sells the stock for $15 per share. The AMT
adjustment is eliminated, and Jean reports $15 - $5 = $10 X 1,000
shares = $10,000 of ordinary income for regular tax and AMT.
There is an important requirement to get this tax benefit. A loss
would have to be "allowable" if the stock was sold at a loss. A
common transaction that would disqualify the disposition for the
escape hatch is a wash sale. A wash sale happens when replacement
shares or an option to acquire replacement shares are acquired
during the period 30 days before or 30 days after the sale.
For example, if Jean purchased 1,000 shares of XYZ Software for
$16 per share on December 10, 2007, she would still have a
disqualifying disposition of the ISO shares, but she would have
$50,000 of ordinary income because the escape hatch wouldn't
apply. Her loss of $15 - $55 = $40 X 1,000 shares would be
disallowed as a current deduction. The disallowed loss would be
added to the tax basis of the replacement shares. Therefore, the
tax basis of the replacement shares would be $16 + $40 = $56 X
1,000 shares = $56,000.
Return to Table of Contents
Consider refundable AMT credit for year-end planning
Remember that AMT credit can be refundable under legislation
effective for 2007. Since the credit is phased out based on
adjusted gross income thresholds, year end planning decisions such
as deferring income or selling assets for capital gains could have
an impact on whether you qualify for the refundable credit. I
would expect that the refundable credit will apply mostly to
retired persons, unemployed persons, or persons on sabbatical.
For more details, see our article, "Refundable AMT Credit Available
for 2007".
Return to Table of Contents
Year-end withholding and estimated tax review
Remember to review your withholding and estimated tax payments to
be sure you avoid penalties for underpayment of estimated tax.
Withholding is considered made evenly during the year. Estimated
tax payments are credited to a quarter according to when they are
paid.
Return to Table of Contents
2007 alternative minimum tax is a fiasco
Here we are at the end of the year, and we still don't know what
the AMT exemption is. The House of Representatives passed H.R.
3996, which includes an AMT "patch". If the "patch" isn't
enacted, millions more middle class taxpayers will be subject to
the AMT. Tax increases are included in the bill to pay for the
revenue loss. President Bush has indicated he would veto this
legislation, if it is also passed by the Senate.
Under H.R. 3996, the AMT exemptions for 2007 would be $66,250 for
joint filers, $33,125 for married, filing separately and $44,350
for singles.
Most tax planning software won't be updated for the AMT change
until it is enacted.
We'll just have to make "best guess" estimates of tax liabilities
based on the law as it stands, for now.
Another issue is the tax forms for next tax season. The IRS has
indicated it won't include changes in the AMT exemption on the
forms because they haven't been passed yet. There are many other
expiring tax provisions involved. The late tax legislation will
result in more errors on 2007 income tax returns.
Return to Table of Contents
IRS issues guidance for reporting non-qualified deferred
compensation on 2007 W-2s
The IRS has issued guidance to employers on reporting non-
qualified deferred compensation on 2007 Forms W-2 and 1099-MISC.
The amounts deferred during the year under a non-qualified
deferred compensation plan are not required to be reported for
employees on box 12 of Form W-2, using code Y or for non-employees
on Form 1099-MISC, box 15a.
The currently taxable income amounts are required to reported for
employees at box 12 of Form W-2, using code Z and for non-
employees in box 7 of Form 1099-MISC.
The Notice also includes information on how to determine the
amount to be reported.
(Notice 2007-89, 2007-46 I.R.B.)
Return to Table of Contents
IRS extends transitional relief for non-qualified
deferred compensation plans
The IRS has provided additional relief to employers that need to
get their non-qualified deferred compensation plans in compliance
with the new rules under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.
During 2008, taxpayers are not required to comply with the
requirements of the final regulations. They are required to
operate a non-qualified deferred compensation plan in compliance
with the plan terms, consistent with Section 409A and applicable
guidance, including Notice 2005-1, which would previously have
been obsolete. If a provision of Notice 2005-1 is inconsistent
with the final regulations, taxpayers may rely on either the final
regulations or Notice 2005-1. If an issue isn't addressed in
Notice 2005-1 or other guidance, taxpayers must apply a
reasonable, good faith interpretation of the statute.
Taxpayers may not rely on the proposed regulations for periods
after December 31, 2007, except for preamble Sections II.E and
VI.E relating to applying Section 409A to partners and
partnerships, sections XI.C for changes in payment elections or
conditions, XI.H for substitutions of non-discounted stock options
and stock appreciation rights for discounted stock options and
stock appreciation rights, to the extent provided in Section 3 of
Notice 2006-79, as modified in Notice 2007-86.
(Notice 2007-86, I.R.B. 2007-46.)
Return to Table of Contents
Ways and Means Chairman Rangel proposes repealing AMT
House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles
Rangel has introduced a bill, H.R. 3970, which would repeal the
alternative minimum tax on individuals, effective for tax years
beginning after December 31, 2007. Since tax increases are
included to make up for the lost revenue, it is highly unlikely
the proposal will pass until President Bush's term of office is
over. However, the proposal might be an indication of what might
happen if a President is elected who is a Democrat.
The principal replacement for the AMT would be a surtax on
"modified adjusted gross income". "Modified adjusted gross
income" would be adjusted gross income minus the investment
interest deduction. Other itemized deductions and personal
exemptions would not be considered for computing the surtax.
A four percent surtax would apply to the excess of modified
adjusted gross income over an initial threshold amount. The
initial threshold amount for married filing joint or a surviving
spouse would be the greater of $200,000 or an amount estimated by
the IRS above which at least 90% of married persons filing a joint
return would be affected by the alternative minimum tax for the
first taxable year beginning in 2008 if it wasn't repealed. The
thresholds for married, filing separately would be 1/2 the amount
for married filing jointly, and the thresholds for singles and
heads of households would be 3/4 the amount for married, filing
jointly.
An additional .6% surtax would apply for modified adjusted gross
income exceeding $250,000, $500,000 for married, filing jointly or
surviving spouses.
The proposed legislation is 129 pages long, including a reduction
in the maximum corporate tax rate from 35% to 30.5% and some
severe cutbacks of business tax breaks.
This proposal is part of a continuing discussion about the AMT
problem, which probably won't be resolved until the next President
takes office.
Return to Table of Contents
Stock swap of ISO stock was a disqualifying disposition
Kadayam Subash was an employee at Ecredit.com. He received
incentive stock options relating to his employment. During
February 2000, International Capital Group (ICG) acquired 30% of
the stock of Ecredit in exchange for some of its own stock. The
employees of Ecredit were invited to participate in the stock
swap.
After the stock swap, in December 2000 and September 2001, ICG
made additional cash investments in Ecredit, increasing its
ownership interest to 99% at one point.
Subash exercised 28,123 of his stock options on June 7, 2000 and
exchanged the shares to receive 14,170 shares of ICG stock.
$534,295 was included in Subash's Form W-2 as ordinary income
relating to the disqualifying disposition of his ISO shares.
Subash initially included the income on his 2000 income tax
returns, but later amended the returns, claiming the swap was a
non-taxable transaction.
In a summary judgment, a U.S. District Court in Massachusetts held
against the taxpayer. In order to qualify for non-recognition,
the "swap" would have to have qualified as a "B" reorganization -
acquisition of at least an 80% interest in a corporation solely in
exchange for stock. Since most of the Ecredit stock was acquired
by ICG for cash, the transactions didn't qualify.
Therefore, Subash had a disqualifying disposition of his ISO
shares, despite not receiving any cash in the transaction.
((Subash v. U.S.), U.S. District Court District of Massachusetts,
July 12, 2007.)
Return to Table of Contents
Secrets of Tax Planning For Employee Stock Option
Seminar for Advisors
Michael Gray, CPA will lead a two-day, 16-hour seminar using
Secrets of Tax Planning For Employee Stock Options, Stock Grants
and ESOPs, 2nd Edition as the textbook. The seminar will take
place on Friday and Saturday, January 25 and 26, 2008 at the
Pruneyard Inn in Campbell, California (about 20 minutes from the
San Jose International Airport). In order to qualify for a
discounted fee, you must register by December 15, 2007. For
details, contact Dawn Siemer at mgray@stockoptionadvisors.com or
telephone 408-918-3162 weekday afternoons.
Return to Table of Contents
Questions and Answers
Question
I am in the process of preparing W-2 forms for our employees, and
have ISO and ESPP disqualifying dispositions for some employees
who were not on our payroll for the 2007 calendar year. ADP, our
payroll service, has purged them since there was no activity for
the year.
Do we need to issue a W-2 for them? They will receive a Form 1099
from the stock brokerage companies for the sale of the stock.
Answer
Yes. You do need to issue a W-2 form for the disqualifying
disposition.
The income to be reported is different from the gross receipts
from the stock sales. The employees should make a basis
adjustment for the ordinary income reported on Form W-2 when they
report the stock sales.
Michael Gray regrets he can no longer answer emails personally.
He will answer selected questions in this newsletter.
We do not provide free technical support for TurboTax!
Return to Table of Contents
Do you know about our other newsletters?
For general tax developments, tax planning ideas, business
development ideas and book reviews, subscribe to Michael Gray, CPA's Tax & Business Insight.
We are now offering our real estate tax newsletter,
Michael Gray, CPA's Real Estate Tax Letter, free of charge. Like this
newsletter, we will talk about new developments, have reports on
special tax concerns, and answer questions and answers. To subscribe and read a sample issue, visit
realestatetaxletter.com.
Return to Table of Contents
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:
As required by U.S. Treasury Regulations, you are hereby advised
that any written tax advice contained in this communication was
not written or intended to be used (and cannot be used) by any
taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be
imposed under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
Return to Table of Contents
Consult with a tax advisor
For our readers who aren’t tax advisors, this newsletter is intended to alert you about tax issues that could affect you. It is not a substitute for advice from a professional tax advisor. You will find that getting advice from a qualified advisor is a worthwhile investment.
Tax advisors should view the newsletter as an alert to become aware of issues relating to employee stock options for further research and study.
Return to Table of Contents
(Michael Gray is the co-author of Employee Stock Options – A Strategic Planning Guide for the 21st Century Optionaire. You can order the book at www.amazon.com or www.barnesandnoble.com or buy it at Stacey’s Books.)
P.S.
To receive the next issue of Michael Gray, CPA's Option Alert with more employee stock option tax developments and answers to questions from our readers automatically via email, subscribe by filling out the form below.